Segal also denied receiving anything inĮxchange for his testimony. Prior incidents of fleeing arrest and possessing methamphetamine. Testified about Friedrichs’s statements regarding the pending charges and Friedrichs’s The CI testified that she works as an informant for the drug task force,Īnd she recounted her activities with Friedrichs on the evening of September 20Īnd the early morning of September 21. Law enforcement witnesses, the CI, and Segal. Because of the late disclosure, Friedrichs movedįor a mistrial or a lengthy continuance to permit further investigation and State provided Friedrichs with a tape recording of Segal’s statement to police. That testimony amounting to Friedrichs’s “braggadocio” would not be admissible. Permitted to testify about the instant offense and Friedrichs’s “chemical The district court ruled that Segal would be Possessing methamphetamine, arguing that notice had not been provided for this Spreigl or Minn.
Testimony regarding Friedrichs’s prior bad acts, including fleeing arrest and
#Vicinity coffee nicollet trial
The preliminary trial proceedings, Friedrichs moved to exclude Segal’s
State provided the summary to Friedrichs’s counsel without also providing a Gave a tape-recorded statement regarding his conversations with Friedrichs. In an interview with Investigator Olson, Segal Regarding the pending charges against Friedrichs and prior incidents whenįriedrichs fled and possessed methamphetamine. Friedrichs made several statements to Segal Placed in a holding cell with Friedrichs for approximately 30 hours. These charges, Jeremy Segal, who was incarcerated on an unrelated matter, was
Methamphetamine precursor chemicals), a violation of Minn. 4(1) (2002) andįirst-degree attempted manufacture of methamphetamine (possession of 1, 4 (2002) possession of a controlled substance, a violation 2003) attempted first-degree manufacture of With first-degree manufacture of methamphetamine, a violation of Minn. On February 4, 2004, Friedrichs was charged Make methamphetamine also were found in the vicinity of the farm. Other ingredients and apparatuses used to During the course of the investigation a thermosĬontaining methamphetamine was found in the wooded area north of the farm. TheĬI directed them to the north of the farm.ĭeputy Nelson heard a crashing sound from that direction, which he believedĭeputies Nelson and Hlavac searched for Friedrichs in this area to noĬI advised that Friedrichs fled with a thermos container. Hlavac, and Nelson entered the farm and, upon arriving at the CI’s vehicle,Īsked the CI where Friedrichs had gone. Jensen lost sight of the CI’s vehicle as it left St. Deputy Steve Hlavac and Deputy Nelson went to Shortly after 4:30 a.m., the CI picked upįriedrichs from the apartment, and Deputy Jensen followed. Jensen drove the CI to the entrance of the farm to determine its location. To drive Friedrichs back to the farm later that morning to manufacture more The CI advised the police that she was going The CI then drove Friedrichs to an abandonedįarm where the CI observed Friedrichs engage in activity consistent with theįriedrichs finished, he and the CI drove to an apartment in St. Peter Holiday gas station where Friedrichs purchased Coleman campingįuel and gave the CI money to buy coffee filters. The following events: on the evening of September 20, the CI accompanied Friedrichs The Minnesota River Valley Drug Task Force spoke with Chief Deputy Karl JensenĪnd Deputy Thor Nelson of the Nicollet County Sheriff’s Department and reported The early morning hours of September 21, a paid confidential informant (CI) for Jacob Friedrichs was convicted of first-degree manufacture of methamphetamine,Īttempted first-degree manufacture of methamphetamine, possession of aĬontrolled substance, and first-degree possession of methamphetamine precursorĬhemicals based on the events of September 21, 2003. The second day of trial (2) the district court abused its discretion byĬonducting an analysis of each relevant factor and (3) there was insufficient To produce a tape-recorded statement made by a key prosecution witness until This appeal from convictions of multiple controlled-substance offenses, appellantĪrgues that (1) the district court abused its discretion by denying his motionįor a mistrial and granting only a one-week continuance after the state failed Peter, MN 56082-0360 (for respondent)Ĭonsidered and decided by Wright, Presiding Gallo, Assistant Attorney General, 1800 Bremer Tower, 445 MinnesotaĬounty Attorney, 326 South Minnesota Avenue, St. McGuire, Assistant State Public Defender, 2221 UniversityĪvenue Southeast, Suite 425, Minneapolis, MN
0 kommentar(er)
